School Accountability Report Card Reported for School Year
2008-09 Published During 2009-10
Executive Summary School Accountability Report Card, 2008-09
Burnt Ranch Elementary School
|
Address: |
251 Burnt Ranch School
Rd. , Burnt Ranch CA 95527-0039 |
Phone: |
530-629-2543 |
|
Principal: |
Terry
Meierding |
Grade Span: |
K - 8 |
This executive summary of the School Accountability
Report Card (SARC) is intended to provide parents and community members with a
quick snapshot of school accountability. The data presented in this report are
reported for the 2008-09 school year, except the School Finances and School
Completion data that are reported for the 2007-08 school year. For additional
information about the school, parents and community members should review the
entire SARC or contact the school principal or the district office.
About This School
|
Burnt
Ranch School District is a one-school district, Kindergarten through grade
eight. We are located in a rural area of Trinity County in Northwestern
California with approximately 350 inhabitants. We have strong community
support with dependable parent involvement. Our community strengths also
include our extended families, alumni, small businesses, river sports, and a
beautiful area in which to live with stores and basic services not far away.
We are a high-performing school with an API of 889. |
Student Enrollment
|
Group |
Percent |
|
African American |
1% |
|
American Indian or Alaska
Native |
30% |
|
Asian |
1% |
|
Filipino |
% |
|
Hispanic or Latino |
8% |
|
Pacific Islander |
0% |
|
White (not
Hispanic) |
60% |
|
Multiple or No
Response |
0 % |
|
Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged |
56.5 % |
|
English Learners |
% |
|
Students with
Disabilities |
8% |
|
Total Number of Students |
100 |
Teachers
|
Indicator |
Teachers |
|
Teachers with full
credential |
6 |
|
Teachers without full
credential |
0 |
|
Teachers Teaching Outside
Subject Area of Competence |
0 |
|
Misassignments of
Teachers of English Learners |
0 |
|
Total Teacher
Misassignments |
0 |
Student Performance
|
Subject |
Students Proficient and Above on California Standards
Tests |
|
English-Language
Arts |
72% |
|
Mathematics |
75% |
|
Science |
100% |
|
History-Social
Science |
90% |
Academic Progress
|
Indicator |
Result |
|
2009 Growth API Score
(from 2009 Growth API Report) |
889 * |
|
Statewide Rank (from 2008
Base API Report) |
9 * |
|
2009-10 Program
Improvement Status (PI Year) |
Not in PI |
School Facilities
Summary of Most Recent Site
Inspection
|
A
thorough site inspection was conducted on November 2, 2009 by the Northern
California Schools Insurance Group. |
Repairs Needed
|
No
findings to correct |
Corrective Actions Taken or
Planned
|
see
above |
Curriculum and Instructional
Materials
|
Core Curriculum Areas |
Pupils Who Lack Textbooks and Instructional
Materials |
|
Reading/Language
Arts |
0% |
|
Mathematics |
0% |
|
Science |
0% |
|
History-Social
Science |
0% |
|
Foreign Language |
0% |
|
Health |
0% |
|
Visual and Performing
Arts |
0% |
|
Science Laboratory
Equipment (grades 9-12) |
0% |
School Finances
|
Level |
Expenditures Per Pupil (Unrestricted Sources Only) |
|
School Site |
11,360.16 |
|
District |
11,360.16 |
|
State |
$5,512 |
School Completion
|
Indicator |
Result |
|
Graduation Rate |
100% |
Postsecondary Preparation
|
Measures |
Percent |
|
Pupils Who Completed a
Career Technical Education Program and Earned a High School Diploma |
N/A |
|
Graduates Who Completed
All Courses Required for University of California or California State
University Admission |
N/A |
NAEP Reading, Grade 4
|
Level |
Result |
|
Average Scale Score -
State |
209 |
|
Average Scale Score -
National |
220 |
|
Achievement Level -
Basic |
30% |
|
Achievement Level -
Proficient |
18% |
|
Achievement Level -
Advanced |
5% |
NAEP Reading, Grade 8
|
Level |
Result |
|
Average Scale Score -
State |
251 |
|
Average Scale Score -
National |
261 |
|
Achievement Level -
Basic |
41% |
|
Achievement Level -
Proficient |
20% |
|
Achievement Level -
Advanced |
2% |
NAEP Mathematics, Grade 4
|
Level |
Result |
|
Average Scale Score -
State |
232 |
|
Average Scale Score -
National |
239 |
|
Achievement Level -
Basic |
41% |
|
Achievement Level -
Proficient |
25% |
|
Achievement Level -
Advanced |
5% |
NAEP Mathematics, Grade 8
|
Level |
Result |
|
Average Scale Score -
State |
270 |
|
Average Scale Score -
National |
282 |
|
Achievement Level -
Basic |
36% |
|
Achievement Level -
Proficient |
18% |
|
Achievement Level -
Advanced |
5% |
School Accountability Report Card Reported for School Year
2008-09 Published During 2009-10
The School Accountability Report Card (SARC), which
is required by law to be published annually, contains information about the
condition and performance of each California public school. More information
about SARC requirements is available on the California Department of Education
(CDE) SARC
Web page. For additional information about the school, parents and community
members should contact the school principal or the district office.
I. Data and Access
DataQuest
DataQuest is an online data tool located on the CDE
DataQuest
Web page that contains additional information about this school and comparisons
of the school to the district, the county, and the state. Specifically,
DataQuest is a dynamic system that provides reports for accountability (e.g.,
Academic Performance Index [API], Adequate Yearly Progress [AYP]), test data,
enrollment, graduates, dropouts, course enrollments, staffing, and data regarding
English learners).
Internet Access
Internet access is available at public libraries
and other locations that are publicly accessible (e.g., the California State
Library). Access to the Internet at libraries and public locations is generally
provided on a first-come, first-served basis. Other use restrictions include the
hours of operation, the length of time that a workstation may be used
(depending on availability), the types of software programs available on a
workstation, and the ability to print documents.
II. About This School
Contact Information (School Year 2009-10)
This section provides the schools contact
information.
|
School |
District |
||
|
School Name |
Burnt Ranch Elementary
|
District Name |
Burnt Ranch Elementary
|
|
Street |
251 Burnt Ranch School
Rd. |
Phone Number |
530-629-2543 |
|
City, State, Zip |
Burnt Ranch ,
CA 95527-0039 |
Web Site |
www.tcoek12.org |
|
Phone Number |
530-629-2543 |
Superintendent |
Sarah Supahan |
|
Principal |
Terry Meierding |
E-mail Address |
ssupahan@tcoek12.org |
|
E-mail Address |
terryn@tcoek12.org |
CDS Code |
53- 71662- 6053680 |
School Description and Mission
Statement (School Year 2008-09)
School Description and Mission Statement (School
Year 2008-09)
|
Burnt Ranch School is
committed to providing a
balanced, quality education in a safe learning environment for our students,
staff and community. |
Opportunities for Parental Involvement (School Year
2008-09)
|
Burnt Ranch has active
parent advisory groups including School Site Council, School Safety
Committee, and the Indian Education Committee |
Student Enrollment by Grade Level
(School Year 2008-09)
This table displays the number of students enrolled
in each grade level at the school.
|
Grade Level |
Number of Students |
|
Kindergarten |
15 |
|
Grade 1 |
7 |
|
Grade 2 |
9 |
|
Grade 3 |
6 |
|
Grade 4 |
11 |
|
Grade 5 |
14 |
|
Grade 6 |
10 |
|
Grade 7 |
18 |
|
Grade 8 |
10 |
|
Ungraded Elementary |
0 |
|
Grade 9 |
0 |
|
Grade 10 |
0 |
|
Grade 11 |
0 |
|
Grade 12 |
0 |
|
Ungraded Secondary |
0 |
|
Total Enrollment |
100 |
Student Enrollment by Group (School
Year 2008-09)
This table displays the percent of students
enrolled at the school who are identified as being in a particular group.
|
Group |
Percent of Total Enrollment |
|
African American |
1.01% |
|
American Indian or Alaska
Native |
38.4 % |
|
Asian |
1.01% |
|
Filipino |
0% |
|
Hispanic or Latino |
8% |
|
Pacific Islander |
0% |
|
White (not
Hispanic) |
50.58% |
|
Multiple or No
Response |
% |
|
Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged |
56.5% |
|
English Learners |
% |
|
Students with
Disabilities |
8.00 % |
Average Class Size and Class Size
Distribution (Elementary)
This table displays by grade level the average
class size and the number of classrooms that fall into each size category (a
range of total students per classroom).
|
Grade Level |
2006-07 |
2007-08 |
2008-09 |
|||||||||
|
Avg. Class Size |
Number of Classrooms |
Avg. Class Size |
Number of Classrooms |
Avg. Class Size |
Number of Classrooms |
|||||||
|
1-20 |
21-32 |
33+ |
1-20 |
21-32 |
33+ |
1-20 |
21-32 |
33+ |
||||
|
K |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.0 |
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
24.0 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.0 |
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
24.0 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.0 |
1 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.0 |
|
1 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
25.0 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
K-3 |
14.0 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3-4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4-8 |
21.0 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
III. School Climate
School Safety Plan (School Year
2008-09)
This section provides information about the
school's comprehensive safety plan.
|
The School Safety Plan
was updated by the School Safety Committee at it's regular meeting this year.
The Safety Plan is a comprehensive plan that addresses the safety concerns of
our community so that we can provide a safe educational environment that promotes
student self worth, responsible citizenship, and critical thinking skills
necessary for productive, meaningful participation in our society. |
Suspensions and Expulsions
This table displays the rate of suspensions and
expulsions (the total number of incidents divided by the total enrollment) at
the school and district levels for the most recent three-year period.
|
Rate |
School |
District |
||||
|
2006-07 |
2007-08 |
2008-09 |
2006-07 |
2007-08 |
2008-09 |
|
|
Suspensions |
0 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
|
Expulsions |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
IV. School Facilities
School Facility Conditions and
Planned Improvements (School Year 2009-10)
This section provides information about the
condition of the schoolÕs grounds, buildings, and restrooms, and a description
of any planned or recently completed facility improvements.
|
All of our facilities are
in good condition and pass all safety standards. |
School Facility Good Repair Status
(School Year 2009-10)
This table displays the results of the most
recently completed school site inspection to determine the school facilityÕs
good repair status.
|
System Inspected |
Repair Status |
Repair Needed and Action Taken or Planned |
|||
|
Exemplary |
Good |
Fair |
Poor |
||
|
Systems: Gas
Leaks, Mechanical/HVAC, Sewer |
N/A |
X |
|
|
|
|
Interior:
Interior Surfaces |
N/A |
X |
|
|
|
|
Cleanliness: Overall
Cleanliness, Pest/ Vermin Infestation |
N/A |
X |
|
|
|
|
Electrical:
Electrical |
N/A |
X |
|
|
|
|
Restrooms/Fountains:
Restrooms, Sinks/ Fountains |
N/A |
X |
|
|
|
|
Safety: Fire
Safety, Hazardous Materials |
N/A |
X |
|
|
|
|
Structural:
Structural Damage, Roofs |
N/A |
X |
|
|
|
|
External:
Playground/School Grounds, Windows/ Doors/Gates/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overall Rating |
LEA Provided |
N/A |
|||
V. Teachers
Teacher Credentials
This table displays the number of teachers assigned
to the school with a full credential, without a full credential, and those
teaching outside of their subject area of competence. Detailed information
about teacher qualifications can be found on the CDE DataQuest
Web page.
|
Teachers |
School |
District |
||
|
2006-07 |
2007-08 |
2008-09 |
2008-09 |
|
|
With Full
Credential |
7 |
4 |
6 |
6 |
|
Without Full
Credential |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Teaching Outside Subject
Area of Competence |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Teacher Misassignments and Vacant
Teacher Positions
This table displays the number of teacher
misassignments (teachers assigned without proper legal authorization) and the
number of vacant teacher positions (not filled by a single designated teacher
assigned to teach the entire course at the beginning of the school year or
semester). Note: Total Teacher Misassignments includes the number of
Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners.
|
Indicator |
2007-08 |
2008-09 |
2009-10 |
|
Misassignments of
Teachers of English Learners |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Total Teacher
Misassignments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Vacant Teacher
Positions |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Core Academic Classes Taught by No
Child Left Behind Compliant Teachers (School Year 2008-09)
This table displays the percent of classes in core
academic subjects taught by No Child Left Behind (NCLB) compliant and non-NCLB
compliant teachers in the school, in all schools in the district, in
high-poverty schools in the district, and in low-poverty schools in the
district. High poverty schools are defined as those schools with student
participation of approximately 75 percent or more in the free and reduced price
meals program. Low poverty schools are those with student participation of
approximately 25 percent or less in the free and reduced price meals program.
More information on teacher qualifications required under NCLB can be found on
the CDE Improving
Teacher and Principal Quality Web page.
|
Location of Classes |
Percent of Classes In Core Academic Subjects |
|
|
Taught by NCLB Compliant Teachers |
Taught by Non-NCLB Compliant Teachers |
|
|
This School |
100% |
100% |
|
All Schools in District
|
100% |
100% |
|
High-Poverty Schools in
District |
100% |
100% |
|
Low-Poverty Schools in
District |
100% |
100% |
VI. Support Staff
Academic Counselors and Other Support
Staff (School Year 2008-09)
This table displays, in units of full-time
equivalents (FTE), the number of academic counselors and other support staff
who are assigned to the school and the average number of students per academic
counselor. One FTE equals one staff member working full time; one FTE could
also represent two staff members who each work 50 percent of full time.
|
Title |
Number of FTE Assigned to School |
Average Number of Students per Academic Counselor |
|
Academic Counselor |
0 |
|
|
Library Media Teacher
(Librarian) |
0 |
|
|
Psychologist |
.17 |
|
|
Social Worker |
0 |
|
|
Nurse |
.17 |
|
|
Speech/Language/Hearing
Specialist |
.12 |
|
|
Resource Specialist
(non-teaching) |
.2 |
|
|
Other |
|
|
VII. Curriculum and Instructional
Materials
Quality, Currency, Availability of
Textbooks and Instructional Materials (School Year 2009-10)
This table displays information about the quality,
currency, and availability of the standards-aligned textbooks and other
instructional materials used at the school, and information about the schoolÕs
use of any supplemental curriculum or non-adopted textbooks or instructional
materials.
|
Core Curriculum Area |
Quality, Currency, and Availability of Textbooks and
Instructional Materials |
Percent of Pupils Who Lack Their Own Assigned Textbooks
and Instructional Materials |
|
Reading/Language
Arts |
good |
0 |
|
Mathematics |
good |
0 |
|
Science |
good |
0 |
|
History-Social
Science |
good |
0 |
|
Foreign Language |
N/A |
N/A |
|
Health |
good |
0 |
|
Visual and Performing
Arts |
good |
0 |
|
Science Laboratory
Equipment (grades 9-12) |
N/A |
N/A |
VIII. School Finances
Expenditures Per Pupil and School
Site Teacher Salaries (Fiscal Year 2007-08)
This table displays a comparison of the schoolÕs
per pupil expenditures from unrestricted (basic) sources with other schools in
the district and throughout the state, and a comparison of the average teacher
salary at the school site with average teacher salaries at the district and
state levels. Detailed information regarding school expenditures can be found
on the CDE Current
Expense of Education & Per-pupil Spending Web page and teacher
salaries can be found on the CDE Certificated Salaries & Benefits Web
page.
|
Level |
Total Expenditures Per Pupil |
Expenditures Per Pupil (Supplemental / Restricted) |
Expenditures Per Pupil (Basic / Unrestricted) |
Average Teacher Salary |
|
School Site |
11,360.16 |
3,997.53 |
7,362.62 |
|
|
District |
same |
same |
same |
$57,337.45 |
|
Percent Difference
– School Site and District |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
State |
N/A |
N/A |
$5,512 |
$56,284 |
|
Percent Difference
– School Site and State |
N/A |
N/A |
$1,850.62 |
$1,053.45 |
Types of Services Funded (Fiscal Year
2008-09)
This section provides information about the
programs and supplemental services that are available at the school and funded
through either categorical or other sources.
|
Burnt Ranch Elementary
has a 56 FTE PE teacher on site offering PE classes regularly to all students
K-8. In addition we have an After School Education and Safety Program until
6pm that provides a safe, healthy and enriching program |
Teacher and Administrative Salaries
(Fiscal Year 2007-08)
This table displays district salaries for teachers,
principals, and superintendents, and compares these figures to the state
averages for districts of the same type and size. The table also displays
teacher and administrative salaries as a percent of a district's budget, and
compares these figures to the state averages for districts of the same type and
size based on the salary schedule. Detailed information regarding salaries may
be found on the CDE Certificated Salaries & Benefits Web page.
|
Category |
District Amount |
State Average For Districts In Same Category |
|
Beginning Teacher Salary |
39,186 |
$38,481 |
|
Mid-Range Teacher Salary |
57,344 |
$55,789 |
|
Highest Teacher Salary |
69,038 |
$70,849 |
|
Average Principal Salary
(Elementary) |
N/A |
$88,862 |
|
Average Principal Salary
(Middle) |
N/A |
$94,015 |
|
Average Principal Salary
(High) |
N/A |
$97,594 |
|
Superintendent Salary |
70,000 if full time |
$110,994 |
|
Percent of Budget for
Teacher Salaries |
28.1 % |
37.20 % |
|
Percent of Budget for
Administrative Salaries |
4.4 % |
6.60 % |
IX. Student Performance
Standardized Testing and Reporting
Program
The Standardized Testing
and Reporting (STAR) Program consists of several key components, including the
California Standards Tests (CSTs); the California Modified Assessment (CMA),
and the California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA). The CSTs show how
well students are doing in relation to the state content standards. The CSTs
include English-language arts (ELA) and mathematics in grades two through
eleven; science in grades five, eight, and nine through eleven; and
history-social science in grades eight, and ten through eleven. The CAPA
includes ELA, mathematics, and science in grades two through eleven, and for
science for grades five, eight, and ten. The CAPA is given to those students
with significant cognitive disabilities whose disabilities prevent them from
taking either the CSTs with accommodations or modifications or the CMA with
accommodations. The CMA includes ELA and mathematics for grades three through
eight and science in grade five and is an alternate assessment that is based on
modifiedachievement standards. The CMA is designed to assess those students
whose disabilities preclude them from achieving grade-level proficiency on an
assessment of the California content standards with or without accommodations.
Student scores are reported as performance levels. Detailed information
regarding the STAR Program results for each grade and performance level,
including the percent of students not tested, can be found on the CDE Standardized Testing
and Reporting (STAR) Results Web site. Program information regarding
the STAR Program can be found in the Explaining 2008 STAR Program Summary Results to the Public
guide. Note: Scores are not shown when the number of students tested
is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too
small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. In no case shall
any group score be reported that would deliberately or inadvertently make
public the score or performance of any individual student.
Standardized Testing and Reporting
Results for All Students – Three-Year Comparison
This table displays the percent of students
achieving at the Proficient or Advanced level (meeting or exceeding the state
standards).
|
Subject |
School |
District |
State |
||||||
|
2006-07 |
2007-08 |
2008-09 |
2006-07 |
2007-08 |
2008-09 |
2006-07 |
2007-08 |
2008-09 |
|
|
English-Language
Arts |
56 |
57 |
71 |
56 |
57 |
71 |
43 |
46 |
50 |
|
Mathematics |
71 |
74 |
74 |
71 |
74 |
74 |
40 |
43 |
46 |
|
Science |
74 |
79 |
83 |
74 |
79 |
83 |
38 |
46 |
50 |
|
History-Social
Science |
* |
* |
91 |
* |
* |
91 |
33 |
36 |
41 |
|
Note:
Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is 10 or less because
the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy
or privacy protection. In no case shall any group score be reported that
would deliberately or inadvertently make public the score or performance of
any individual student. |
|||||||||
Standardized Testing and Reporting
Results by Student Group (School Year 2008-09)
This table displays the percent of students, by
group, achieving at the Proficient or Advanced level (meeting or exceeding the
state standards) for the most recent testing period.
|
Group |
Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or
Advanced |
|||
|
English-Language Arts |
Mathematics |
Science |
History-Social Science |
|
|
African American |
|
|
|
|
|
American Indian or Alaska
Native |
61 |
61 |
26 |
9 |
|
Asian |
* |
* |
* |
* |
|
Filipino |
* |
* |
* |
* |
|
Hispanic or Latino |
75 |
75 |
* |
* |
|
Pacific Islander |
* |
* |
* |
* |
|
White (not
Hispanic) |
92 |
100 |
84 |
* |
|
Male |
* |
* |
* |
* |
|
Female |
100 |
92 |
* |
* |
|
Economically
Disadvantaged |
82.3 |
78 |
83.5 |
91 |
|
English Learners |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
|
Students with
Disabilities |
* |
* |
* |
* |
|
Students Receiving
Migrant Education Services |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Note: Scores are not shown when the number of
students tested is 10 or less because the number of students in this category
is too small for statistical accuracy or privacy protection. In no case shall
any group score be reported that would deliberately or inadvertently make
public the score or performance of any individual student.
California Physical Fitness Test
Results (School Year 2008-09)
The California Physical Fitness Test is
administered to students in grades five, seven, and nine only. This table
displays by grade level the percent of students meeting fitness standards for
the most recent testing period. Detailed information regarding this test, and
comparisons of a schoolÕs test results to the district and state levels, may be
found on the CDE Physical Fitness Testing (PFT) Web page. Note:
Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less because
the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy
or privacy protection. In no case shall any group score be reported that would
deliberately or inadvertently make public the score or performance of any
individual student.
|
Grade Level |
Percent of Students Meeting Healthy Fitness Zones |
||
|
Four of Six Standards |
Five of Six Standards |
Six of Six Standards |
|
|
5 |
25.0 |
33.3 |
16.7 |
|
7 |
5.6 |
22.2 |
38.9 |
|
9 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
X. Accountability
Academic Performance Index
The Academic Performance Index (API) is an annual
measure of the academic performance and progress of schools in California. API
scores range from 200 to 1,000, with a statewide target of 800. Detailed
information about the API can be found on the CDE Academic
Performance Index (API) Web page.
Academic Performance Index Ranks
– Three-Year Comparison
This table displays the schoolÕs statewide and
similar schools API ranks. The statewide API rank ranges from one to ten. A
statewide rank of one means that the school has an API score in the lowest ten
percent of all schools in the state, while a statewide rank of ten means that
the school has an API score in the highest ten percent of all schools in the
state. The similar schools API rank reflects how a school compares to 100
statistically matched Òsimilar schools.Ó A similar schools rank of one means
that the schoolÕs academic performance is comparable to the lowest performing
ten schools of the 100 similar schools, while a similar schools rank of ten
means that the schoolÕs academic performance is better than at least 90 of the
100 similar schools.
|
API Rank |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
|
Statewide |
7 * |
9 * |
9 * |
|
Similar Schools |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
|
"N/A" |
means a number is not
applicable or not available due to missing data. |
||
|
"B" |
means this is either an
LEA or an Alternative Schools Accountability Model (ASAM) school. Schools
participating in the ASAM do not currently receive growth, target
information, or statewide or similar schools rankings on this report in
recognition of their markedly different educational missions and populations
served. ASAM schools are covered under the Alternative Accountability system
as required by Education Code Section 52052 and not the API accountability
system. However, API information is needed to comply with the federal No
Child Left Behind (NCLB) law. Growth, target and rank information are not
applicable to LEAs. |
||
|
"C" |
means this is a special
education school. Statewide and similar schools ranks are not applicable to
special education schools. |
||
|
" *
" |
means this API is
calculated for a small school or a small LEA, defined as having between 11
and 99 valid STAR Program test scores included in the API. APIs based on
small numbers of students are less reliable and therefore should be carefully
interpreted. Similar schools ranks are not calculated for small schools. |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
Academic Performance Index Growth by
Student Group – Three-Year Comparison
This table displays, by student group, the actual
API changes in points added or lost for the past three years, and the most
recent API score. Note: "N/A" means that the student group is not
numerically significant.
|
Group |
Actual API Change |
Growth API Score |
|||
|
2006-07 |
2007-08 |
2008-09 |
2009 |
||
|
All Students at the
School |
55 |
15 |
23 |
889 * |
|
|
African American |
|
|
|
|
|
|
American Indian or Alaska
Native |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asian |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filipino |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hispanic or Latino |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pacific Islander |
|
||||